Over 59603

Pant Politics




TAGS: obama black panthers riots politics
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by ChadAllen

terroraustralis - July 14, 2013, 12:09 am
its not the new black panther party that people have to worry about, its the wannabe gangbangers like trayvon, who for the last few weeks have been posting **** like "i need a new TV" in response to tweeted threats of rioting if zimmerman is aquitted.
JGalt - July 13, 2013, 11:47 pm
JGalt - July 13, 2013, 11:46 pm
terroraustralis - July 13, 2013, 11:30 pm
peaceful protesters are doing nothing wrong. but anyone who tries to riot and cause violence because of the zimmerman case, is a f***ing terrorist who deserves a missile through their roof.
terroraustralis - July 13, 2013, 11:28 pm
i have a dream that americans will one day live in a country terrorists will be judged not by the colour of their skin, but by the content of their threats.

VOTING ASSISTANTS - They are only there to help those that do not know how to vote properly!


NOVEMBER - Not just any month, but "Voter Assistance" month!

President Pantywaist -

TAGS: battaile vik pantywaist
Rating: 4.08/5

More politifakes by vbattaile

Rudedog - May 16, 2013, 10:14 pm
Apparently it wasn't raining in Benghazi.

YOU LIE!! - No, not Joe Wilson but our troops are shouting it. Combat brigades are being renamed as "advisors" so Obama can promise that all combat troops are withdrawn. See the pattern forming?

TAGS: pants on fire
Rating: 3.94/5

More politifakes by JGalt

ANTI GUN-CONTROL POLICY - Originated by the Black Panther; aped by the white people of the National Rifle Association.

VOTE OR DIE - Just do it, cracka!


OBAMA: NATIONAL DISGRACE - Lemmings for Change

VOTING ASSISTANTS - They are only there to help those that do not know how to vote properly!

TAGS: voter intimidation black panthers
Rating: 3.73/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - November 10, 2012, 3:22 am
Helping again in 2012!


Obama's teleprompter -

liar-liar -

NOMINATION ACCEPTANCE SPEECH - Liar, Liar, pants on fire

TAGS: pants
Rating: 4.86/5

More politifakes by JGalt

PANTS ON FIRE (NOW A SERIES) - Transparency? Who needs transparency?

Arrested for DUI -

RUGGED INDIVIDUALISM? - More like pantywaste parasitism.

What a difference... -

OBAMA SHARES STAGE WITH NEW BLACK PANTHERS - Obama: Embraces Black Racist Criminals, Supported & Endorsed by Al Sharpton.



Racism is Alive and Well in the UK -

TAGS: rampant british racism
Rating: 3.29/5

More politifakes by EmmaRoydes

OTC - June 6, 2014, 10:24 am
Britain and France are fed up with losing their culture and sovereignty, they finally woke up to what was happening

" THE DEPARTMENTS OF JUST US " - Perez does not believe in the race neutral application of certain civil rights laws.

CURSES! - And Romney would've gotten away with the election, too, if it weren't for that single meddling black guy at the polls!


Pathological untrruth #4,582,248 -

What do republicans and steel panther have in common? -

liar-liar, pantsuit on fire -

NSA will not release tapes of tarmac conversations -

Most Transparent Administration Ever??? -

The KKK & The Black Panther Party -

The Left's Infatuation With Cop-Killing Radicals -

Liberal Hypocrisy -

stop asking -

F.E.C. says bernie broke law -

Department of State -

orange is the new black -

Hillary in 2016? -

TAGS: drop pants bill clinton
Rating: 4.5/5

More politifakes by OTC

fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 5:52 pm
LOL 5Ls on Calron's comment/youtubelink (if it were possible) =) Funny vid.
calron - April 18, 2015, 5:14 pm

if you think it's about color, what does that say -

Ocala Florida councilwoman Mary Rich -

distasteful and offensive -

offensive ups and downs -

TAGS: confederate flag saggy pants
Rating: 2.02/5

More politifakes by OTC

OTC - July 19, 2015, 11:52 pm
On that we can agree, ours is filled with a bunch of idiot activists
mittromney - July 18, 2015, 7:25 pm
/Our court is Supreme to your's, yes/
OTC - July 18, 2015, 5:54 pm
You do realize Canada has a Supreme Court as well, right?
mittromney - July 18, 2015, 4:51 pm
/Im in Canada,by the way.We dont need yo stinking Supreme Court ~ we are ahead of the curve here in human rights, and pretty much everything else.Don't worry, I think you guys are still #1 in watered-down Beer, or whatever you fellas like to call it. ~Q/
mittromney - July 18, 2015, 4:47 pm
/didn't realize you could tell someone's race based on internet comments. Huh. You will have to teach me that trick/transracial? Us civilized folks like to call it, bi-racial, which technically I am. I know you were going for humor there.Sorry,you failed/
OTC - July 18, 2015, 11:04 am
You say your black but your inflammatory remarks are of an angry white liberal, so that makes you a transracial. Don't worry though, I'm sure the Supreme Court will rule that you have equal rights too.
OTC - July 18, 2015, 8:11 am
If it's my own business, why do people keep putting their nose in it? I thought the argument was about republicans and democrats, not my gender, which you still can't answer anyways
Thegde - July 18, 2015, 4:43 am
Typical, only use what fits your narrative. That's a cheap ploy clthulu to use the false claim that OTC is transgendered to slip in a slur and distract from an argument, but commonly used by the little children here who can't put up a sound argument.
mittromney - July 18, 2015, 1:29 am
/also,just read the other comments.if you are transgendered,that's no one's business but your own.The h8ters can f*** off.Everyone has a right to love whoever they want.I'm stoked over marriage rights in the US.More power to you 0TC!~peACe~lOVe~reSPEct/
mittromney - July 18, 2015, 1:24 am
if you make it an issue in order to get one over on another, then own it. But don't back down. what I don't get is why you'd ride the fence bro? To me that's manipulative in my opinion./I'm black but I don't think that makes me an expert in racism/
mittromney - July 18, 2015, 1:18 am
/freaks? pot calling the kettle black. OTC, you made it an issue. You tell us man. you said "how does it feel that a woman has a bigger sack than you" in an argument with another member in order to a leg up in argument with them.
OTC - July 17, 2015, 9:14 pm
Why are you freaks so obsessed about my gender? what is my gender anyways, since you know me so well?
OTC - July 17, 2015, 12:10 pm
You're leaving again? or am I. just having deja vu?
guest818 - July 17, 2015, 1:34 am
p.s.Someone PMed me[not BEcca or faux]that you accused me of being a sock of Fauxnews when you said "Cheerio".LoL.For the record,I defended you and laughed it off as silly paranoia.Correct me if I was wrong :: but I dont believe you'd do that.Bye Moo =o)
guest818 - July 17, 2015, 1:24 am
It's all good,Moo. We all have to deal with things in our own way. Growing up, I was the big guy who stuck up for the little guy. Wasn't doing it because it "suited me." Just my nature. Nothing personal.You shouldn't make it personal either.Bye friend =o)
guest818 - July 17, 2015, 1:14 am
But it is morally wrong the way you are handling this problem with MMessEnnBeeCee, and I can see how my desire to protect my friends is making things worse. That is the reason I am leaving,for the greater good.I can't control you, but I can remove myself.
guest818 - July 17, 2015, 1:11 am
It's not as big a deal for me as you are making it out to be, Moo. I'll be fine. I've just been horsing around. But I don't mind sticking my neck out for a few friends here that don't feel safe around you. Yet I've defended you anyways, and still will.
guest818 - July 17, 2015, 1:01 am
Hopefully on a political site we can dare to disagree with those in charge.I have been respectful to you. There's no need to be sarcastic with me. As a leader, the buck stops with you and leadership, as BEcca pointed out.
guest818 - July 17, 2015, 12:56 am
And I used the word "softball" because in dealing with MMess, who has been 20 times aggressive than any of us, you easily could've been as hard on him rather than singling out Rebecca in a way that simply wasn't nice and possibly embarrassing for her.
guest818 - July 17, 2015, 12:54 am
Will all due respect, Moo, in your softball warning to MMess in #77809, you were directly responding to a post where he accused us [again] of being dead trees. I didn't think it was necessary at that point. You can't tell me you still didn't notice it.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 17, 2015, 12:47 am

Funny, when I asked for links and reports on these accusations from you both I was provided with nothing. See ya when it suits ya to return......I'm not catering to blank pages. Cheerio.
rebeccaolsen - July 17, 2015, 12:29 am
Bye Politifake, thanks for the memories! :D
rebeccaolsen - July 17, 2015, 12:28 am
Sorry, I'm done too. Sorry, Zeit (and if you read this, Faux). I'm outie 5000. And unlike Arnnatz/Emma, when I finally say I'm gone, I don't need to come back in the form of a cowardly sock. I mean it. This shrine of ego is actually perfect the way it is.
rebeccaolsen - July 17, 2015, 12:25 am
Saw this coming :( *sigh* Farewell, Starlord. That saying "the buck stops here" should but doesn't apply to this place, and never will. And this chronic problem with Arnnatz/StoneTools/EmmaRoydes/MMessEnnBeeCee apparently will NEVER go away.
guest818 - July 17, 2015, 12:19 am
It was fun y'all. Starlord is out ^_^
guest818 - July 17, 2015, 12:18 am
You are enabling a troll whose behavior is highly suspicious. However, I respect your right to run this forum the way you see fit, even if it means letting EmmaRoyde's troll. So I respectfully must leave. Thank you for your hospitality /no sarcasm.
guest818 - July 17, 2015, 12:16 am
-and other girl names, which I take to be you being funny and razzing some of these guys back. Which is all in good fun. In fact, you gave OTC the hardest time of all over his lies about his gender.
guest818 - July 17, 2015, 12:14 am
However, it is clear EMma's strategy is to provoke us into an emotional response (which violates the site rules) so you will step in, and you are falling for it, again. And you've on many occasionally jokingly called trolls on this site Susan-
guest818 - July 17, 2015, 12:11 am
Will all due respect, Moo, since you've stepped into this some of us have been called "dead trees" (again), razzed hard by EMma, falsely accused, and trolled many times. And you haven't said a thing. I don't report it because I can take it, like a man.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 17, 2015, 12:02 am

Let's drop the Caitlyn stuff. It's transparent and pointless.Pull out a chair, throw your cape on a puddle, This site could use some more gentlemanly behavior.....
guest818 - July 16, 2015, 11:09 pm
Thanks man. Have a good one, Q.
mittromney - July 16, 2015, 10:19 pm
/props for your Iran poster btw! :o) keep it real, SL. ttfn ~ Q./
mittromney - July 16, 2015, 10:18 pm
/np,SL~I saw Cee3P0 stuck his Pinocchio nose into your feud with OCP,but he whined just last week about how unfair it is when everyone gets each others backs when he's on a rampage.I took his hypocrisy as an invite.Or 2 quote him: it's par for the course/
guest818 - July 16, 2015, 9:39 pm
guest818 - July 16, 2015, 9:38 pm
[#78007,#78008] Thank you for the a**ist, Q. {:o]
guest818 - July 16, 2015, 9:35 pm
[#78006]You're still projecting.My bad for not being clear::let me rephrase my question to you[posed in comment #77991]I'll spell it out for you carefully so there's no more misunderstandings. "Anything else 'we haven't heard from you before',Caitlyn?"^.^
mittromney - July 16, 2015, 9:19 pm
only you would believe you're a repository of fact and expect any intelligent soul to believe you don't actively dislike liberals and apolitical professionals,like scientists or historians,for the most biased reasons {mostly b/c they dont agree with you}/
mittromney - July 16, 2015, 9:14 pm
/then you must be a liberal according to your own logic.Climate change is the perfect example - you deny scientific fact from heavily scrutinized scientists but accept and promote evidence against AGW from unscientific corporate funded rightwing websites/
OTC - July 16, 2015, 9:06 pm
Stating facts on one side, name calling on the other side, and that's a (liberal) debate
mittromney - July 16, 2015, 8:41 pm
/this line - "You can thank me later for putting you (back) in your place" = #epicpwnage.Trolls like Cee(with persecution complexes & grandiose egos)are the internet equivalent of fish in a barrel. Nice shooting there, Starlord! cue ~hooked on a feeling~/
guest818 - July 16, 2015, 6:53 pm
PS. You forgot you are not mod again, you are talking about people being banned as if you have the authority. You can thank me later for putting you (back) in your place, newbie. ^.^
guest818 - July 16, 2015, 6:49 pm
How was I supposed to know OTC was transgendered?LoL Or were you speaking for yourself.Tell you what, if you clarify that for me,then we will talk ^_^ For the record,I've nothing against transgendered folk.But I do think your arguments are pretty g.ay, EM
guest818 - July 16, 2015, 6:40 pm
The burden is on you to offer evidence for your incredible claims,Caitlyn.Not on us to entertain your unfounded ignorance.Maybe someone else will fall for your false equivalence fallacy -ie.no one owes someone who has lost credibility fairness in a debate
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 16, 2015, 6:02 pm
g**/Transgender slurs can get you banned
OTC - July 16, 2015, 5:52 pm
So you can't be specific, not surprising
guest818 - July 16, 2015, 1:21 pm
LoL. "Exactly" [is right]. Anything else, Caitlyn?
OTC - July 16, 2015, 1:12 pm
Deny what, exactly
guest818 - July 16, 2015, 11:23 am
If that was true, you wouldn't go out of your way to self-consciously deny it. ^_^ And, yeah, it's obvious this place is pushing your bu.ttons. Again, with the projecting.
OTC - July 16, 2015, 8:53 am
Not projecting, just pushing but.tons
guest818 - July 15, 2015, 11:14 pm
[#77978,#77979] Yup, called it.(i.e.#77976) ^.^
guest818 - July 15, 2015, 11:12 pm
With that concluding today's, ahem, "debate", time to wrap up the show....^_^....Today's "retort" by OTC was brought to you by the letters, B and S. And the number "two" www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Number+two
guest818 - July 15, 2015, 11:07 pm
You're projecting,OTC. So,in that spirit- Liberal? You got Civil war history backwards,so why not? WTF? Yup,that's what the rest of us think when you share your propaganda.And as for the rest, we don't need you to share your IQ with us. We already know.
OTC - July 15, 2015, 10:56 pm
Today's liberal retort was brought to you by the letters, W, T, and F. And by the number 0
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 15, 2015, 10:52 pm
Not that you are capable of understanding any of that though.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 15, 2015, 10:51 pm
Unfortunately for you, you lack any credibility whatsoever. You can't respond without attacking the person and ignoring the content. You should concern yourself less with shoddy attempts at slamming people and look inward for the real problems.
guest818 - July 15, 2015, 10:22 pm
Anything else? ^_^
guest818 - July 15, 2015, 10:22 pm
You lack authority.So admonishment is fan fiction.OTC has no credibility IMHO.You're not a mod.ergo-No one has to take your concerns seriously,nor does anyone.Especially considering you're a troll with a personality disorder whose blown it multiple times
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 15, 2015, 4:44 pm
Strange how you didn't address anything in OTC's comment, but instead used a lame attack on him instead. Now that I think of it, it's not strange at all that you would do that. It's par for the course.
guest818 - July 15, 2015, 3:00 pm
You believe the military is preparing to "take over Texas." If that's not bad enough, you can't even get your own gender straight. What makes you think any one would take you seriously on matters of objectivity or fact? #credibilityfail ^.^
OTC - July 15, 2015, 2:47 pm
A couple of things in the newly formed Republican party's platform; concern about the right to keep and bear arms was being infringed, & government was getting too big. You're right, that does sound like today's liberals
guest818 - July 13, 2015, 11:47 pm
Only to your ignorant, uneducated ears.
OTC - July 13, 2015, 10:56 pm
The Republican platform of 1856 doesn't sound like liberals of today
guest818 - July 11, 2015, 6:19 pm
150 years ago Republicans in America were a Northern Yankee Liberal Party. Abraham Lincoln was a Yankee who was against Southern States Rights. Parties changed names. Your understanding of history is not only romantic, it is self-serving and delusional.
mittromney - July 11, 2015, 3:46 pm
/that's a hoot. Your revisionist propagandist views on history are about as backwards as your religious interpretations of science. The Civil war South was very conservative, the Yankees were considered the liberals of the time. obvious denier is obvious/
OTC - July 11, 2015, 10:12 am
I'm not surprised considering you believe the Confederate flag was a Republican loss, when it was designed by a Democrat, used by southern democrat states, & flown on South Carolina capital, the first state to withdraw from the union. Republican loss. lol
fauxnews - July 10, 2015, 12:16 am
I don't agree. Sorry, mate.
OTC - July 9, 2015, 5:36 pm
I'm sticking to history, not romanticizing anything
fauxnews - July 9, 2015, 3:15 pm
I was offering political correctness on the romanticization and demonization of history to explain today.Back then was even worse with the Mussolini playbook where Leninist style propaganda was not just acceptable but encouraged.Stick with selling flags
fauxnews - July 9, 2015, 3:13 pm
from an ignorant time when propaganda and World War was on the rise is dishonest? bwhahahahahahahah. *sigh* *wipe tear* Surrrrre OTC. And Im sure the Bible nailed it too given it's 2000 years old. Where did you come up with THAT argument?
fauxnews - July 9, 2015, 3:11 pm
On #77909, no s**t. The public on both sides were held hostage by idiots in power in the South and, to a lesser extent, the North. That's why those pictures of brothers fighting each other are so heartbreaking. On the rest, you doubt that history books
fauxnews - July 9, 2015, 3:09 pm
the US had enough and holding the South criminally response for everything from slavery to their backward arse views of civilization. You are sticking to your populist romanticized view of the South,not unlike your religious beliefs on MMCC(2/2)
fauxnews - July 9, 2015, 3:08 pm
I cant speak for "Q", but on #77913, depicting the South as proto-Stalinists (as Rebecca pointed out) is very accurate.No one was saying that the South wasn't terrorizing the Union before the war,the war was essentially Lincoln finally saying (1/2)
OTC - July 9, 2015, 3:00 pm
Mitt stated the south withdrew from the union to declare war on America, that is the revisionist history. pro-slavery and anti-slavery were killing each other long before the secession.
fauxnews - July 9, 2015, 2:44 pm
***I had no idea g r a p e s was a naughty word. X-D Must be because of the word r a p e. Maybe we should change the name of it to Bill Cosby fruit, in light of the recent bombshell disclosures over his behavior? Cheers everyone :-) Enjoy your weekend
fauxnews - July 9, 2015, 2:41 pm
Blaming libs for a cultural moment over that flag that all of America is onboard with is sour gra**s.I understand your protest,but Political correctness is the enemy,and Repubs are guilty too.One need only look at their religion for proof of that(5/5)
OTC - July 9, 2015, 2:37 pm
You're wrong, many southerners did not want to leave the union, & did not want war. And I doubt this history book (copyrighted 1913) written 52 years after he war, & 60 years before political correctness & liberals trying to change history, is revisioned
fauxnews - July 9, 2015, 2:28 pm
So what if they are (and have been) bitter since? The loser of a civil war/insurrection doesn’t get to write the history books, their loss wrote it for them.(4/5)
fauxnews - July 9, 2015, 2:27 pm
that the South was guilty of treason and insurrection. Lincoln declared unconditional war against them,the South was allowed to hold onto nothing when they surrendered,and it was an unconditional surrender,like the US expected of the awful Japanese.(3/5)
fauxnews - July 9, 2015, 2:26 pm
War is just policy, but by another means-and the South failed-so they were wrong, they knew what they were getting themselves into, they knew the price. And the South was forced (BY force) to concede Lincoln’s position (2/5)
fauxnews - July 9, 2015, 2:25 pm
For the South, they saw the flag as a symbol of rebellion against tyranny, to the rest of the Union that flag was a symbol of treason-a defense of inhumanity and criminal behavior.That’s why they had a civil war, and the South lost,mate.(1/5)
fauxnews - July 9, 2015, 2:23 pm
The South very well knew,and wanted,violent war.That's just spin on their part like pre-world war 2 Germany's claim that they "wanted peace".When the North offered to meet them on the battlefield,the South attacked like terrorists on their road there(2/2)
fauxnews - July 9, 2015, 2:21 pm
You are oversimplifying,OTC. Also, you are relying on revisionist history. South didn't just want their own nation. They wanted to destroy the Union.You leave out the South's behavior on the battlefield, slavery,their backward's arse cultural beliefs(1/2)
OTC - July 9, 2015, 8:46 am
President Davis and his a**ociates believed justified in their cause and few of them had any idea that seperation would bring war. Both sides tried to comprise
OTC - July 9, 2015, 8:20 am
That's why South Carolina withdrew from the union, they saw democrats would have won the election by popular vote.
OTC - July 9, 2015, 8:16 am
Short sided? someone said the flag was by domestic terrorists who declared war on America, the states withdrew from the union to form a southern nation, not to declare war. Lincoln won the electoral votes, but Douglas won the popular votes
mittromney - July 8, 2015, 10:04 pm
/if you can't answer a simple question then I take it you are putting words into my mouth to strawman me because the facts don't say what you want them to say,and you are stuck with an argument you simply can't defend, and are too embarrassed to admit it/
mittromney - July 8, 2015, 9:58 pm
/again i never meant anyone was asking you for $$$. Other people seem to get it.Even if you're that dense, I took the time to spell it out. Now you're grasping for straws/ the point is - are you selling these privately or as part of a small business?/
rebeccaolsen - July 8, 2015, 9:33 pm
In the meanwhile, I thought in comments #77686,#77687 we cleared the air. I'm not "harassing you" with my stubborn POV anymore than you are doing to me when you post your harsh anti-science Global warming POV on mine or Faux's posters. Glass houses, OTC
rebeccaolsen - July 8, 2015, 9:28 pm
If you don't like it, then I don't know why you would make a provocative poster like this on a political website.If you don't want me to comment on your posters, promise me you won't comment on mine or about me, directly and indirectly. Problem solved.
rebeccaolsen - July 8, 2015, 9:23 pm
As for the rest, you bragged about selling Confederate flags as your protest over a nationwide ban of them. It's a sensitive issue given that it was used as a symbol of a recent domestic terrorist attack.If we can't debate it here, then where else?
rebeccaolsen - July 8, 2015, 9:20 pm
Sorry,the others convinced me to stick around :) Your loss.If you saw that,you also saw that Moo warned everyone to drop that argument, one that didnt even involve you,that was the product of a misunderstanding of sorts once all the relevant info came out
rebeccaolsen - July 8, 2015, 9:15 pm
It's also a short-sighted answer.Do we blame a lantern for starting the Chicago fires or the terribly designed tinderbox buildings?Thoughtfully:the Confederate flag is a symbol of those who tried to reimagine America as a totalitarian region.Good riddance
OTC - July 8, 2015, 9:13 pm
So what's not true about what you said I said? I said I got requests for flags (not money) & you just reaffirmed that. Besides, someone said "Either way this is my last post. Bye Politifake." & yet, here you are harassing me about what I said as not true.
OTC - July 8, 2015, 9:05 pm
The short answer is the election of Lincoln
rebeccaolsen - July 8, 2015, 4:29 pm
...It wasn't because the mean ole'North didn't respect their state rights enough. The Pre-civilwar South were being a bunch of psychopathic [email protected]$holes.
rebeccaolsen - July 8, 2015, 4:28 pm
...and now the technology was evolving to allow them to maintain that fascist culture with the world's first stab at Totalitarianism. The rest of the US had enough and was willing to hold them criminally responsible for essential their proto-Stalinism...
rebeccaolsen - July 8, 2015, 4:26 pm
Nope. Essentially the plantation owners had govt power which is fancy speak for quixotic medieval warlords of the South still living in the past (ie.slavery, Royalty passage rites, etc.). They were trying to hold onto a barbaric way of life...
mittromney - July 8, 2015, 4:23 pm
/that's what you're nitpicking over? The phrase reads: received requests [for the flag,in exchange for] $$$ [they'd give you for it].The meaning is clear. I have only 255 characters to work with here. You're playing dumb,not that you need an excuse.geeez/
OTC - July 8, 2015, 4:20 pm
That's not what triggered the secession
rebeccaolsen - July 8, 2015, 4:18 pm
The United States wasnt asking anything unreasonable of the South that required them to engage in violent insurrection.They lived in the medieval past,they even held onto rituals like jousting.They wanted to preserve a fascistic culture.Stand by my answer

war on women -